刍议量刑建议书  

A Tentative Study on Sentencing Proposal

作　　者：李昌林[1] 王欢欢[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第6期19-24,共6页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：当前,作为刑事诉讼中重要法律文书的量刑建议书,遇到了立法上的尴尬和法理上的瓶颈,除自身文书问题和执行突破外,在实践中也面临文书规范性不足、司法定位较模糊、内部救济不合理等问题,在主体和各方受众的观念上也存在现实的异化现象。然而,扮演"公诉职能的延伸、监督职能的需要、审判职能的参辅与预防功能的助力"的量刑建议书,不能因为存在问题而取消,而是需要我们做诸如"规范文本、端正定位,重塑规则、保持动态,扭转观念、发扬长处,增强互动,加强监督"等方面的规范工作,以求量刑建议书功能价值的合法发挥。At present, sentencing proposal, an important legal document in criminal procedures, is faced with problemslike lack of legislation support and jurisprudence bottlenecks. In addition to problems in the writ itself and in the effectiveness of execution, there also exist such problems in practice as lack of normative format, obscure judi- cial positioning and unjustified internal remedies. And alienation also exists in the conception of the subject and the other parties. However, as ＂an extension of the function of public prosecution, a demand of the function of supervi- sion, and an assistance to judicial function and a boost to preventive function＂, sentencing proposal cannot be can- celled in spite of these problems. Instead, to ensure the effective and legitimate performance of sentencing proposal, regulatory work should be done on ＂document normalization, positioning regularization, rules reshaping, dynamic maintaining, perception reversing, advantages promoting, interaction strengthening, and supervision enhancing＂.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼 法律文书 量刑 量刑建议书 公诉机关 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]