刑事诉讼专家辅助人出庭的观点争议及其解决思路  

Controversies over the Appearance in Court of Expert Assistants in Criminal Proceedings and Its Solution

作　　者：郭华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院

出　　处：《证据科学》2013年第4期428-436,共9页Evidence Science

基　　金：2012年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目"专家辅助人制度的中国模式研究"(编号:12SFB2028)

摘　　要：我国2012年修改的《刑事诉讼法》和《民事诉讼法》对"有专门知识的人"的规定相当简略,尤其是其出庭"适用鉴定人的有关规定"表述,不仅存在"有专门知识的人"是作为专家证人还是专家辅助人之争论,而且还引发是否有必要界定为中立的鉴定人诉讼地位之分歧。基于此,"有专门知识的人"参与法庭是否需要准入限制、法庭如何行使审查权限以及是否适用回避制度、其权利义务如何确定、如何在法庭上进行质证、其质证的效力如何以及在法庭上应安排何种位置等问题需要理论予以澄清,而理论需要结合我国司法制度与诉讼制度的要求及其功能作出具有规范意义的诠释。China has revised the Criminal Procedure Law and the Civil Procedure Law in 2012, which stipulate the ＂people with expertise＂ in a brief way. Most of all, the expression that the appearance in court of the ＂people with expertise＂ should ＂apply the relevant provisions of the identifiers＂ has brought about heated debates not only about whether ＂a person with expertise＂ is an expert witness or an expert assistant, but also whether they should be defined to be a neutral identifier with litigation status. Based on this, many problems arise, such as whether an admittance restriction to court of ＂person with expertise＂ is required; how courts exercise the power of review; whether the withdrawal system is applied; how the rights and obligations of the ＂person with expertise＂ are defined; how examinations in court are conducted and the effectiveness thereof judged; what status ＂peopie with expertise＂ should have in court, and so on. To handle all the issues, there is a requirement to clarify the problems in theories, which calls for combining the theories with the requirements of the judicial and litigation systems

关 键 词：专家辅助人 准入制度 回避制度 法庭审查 解决思路 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]