检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵雅琨[1]
出 处:《河北广播电视大学学报》2013年第5期71-74,共4页Journal of Hebei Radio & TV University
摘 要:对公司僵局进行司法救济的前提是公司僵局之不可回避、不可自救,由此获得司法干预的法理基础:亟需填补的法律漏洞、公司自力救济不能、其他救济途径用尽,是司法救济的必要性所在;维护股东权利、实现实质正义、满足期待利益,这是司法救济的正当性所在;司法介入应遵循几项基本原则,这是司法救济的适当性所在。同时,思考公司自治与司法介入的关系,希望在对国家强制保持警惕的同时信任司法救济,最终达到平衡各方利益的善果。When the corporate deadlock is inevitable and cannot be helped by itself, the judicial inter- ference appears. The necessity of the judicial remedy is: urgent need to fill the legal loophole, no capability to help itself, no alternative means to remedy. The justification is. the protection of the right and benefits of the shareholders, the access to justice and satisfaction of the interests. The propriety is judicial interfer- ence abiding by several main principles. Judicial intervention should adhere to the basic principle, which is where the appropriateness of judicial relief lies. Meanwhile, the relation between corporate autonomy and judicial intervention should be concerned, hoping to trust the judicial relief at the vigilance on the national mandatory, so that to balance the concerned parties~ rights and interests.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145