我国死刑量刑程序改革渐进之路  

The Gradual Path of Sentencing Procedure Reform for Death Penalty Case in China

作　　者：马运立[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院经济贸易法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第11期93-99,共7页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：作者主持的山东省社会科学规划研究项目"判例法律地位与司法公正问题研究"(批准号:08CFXJ09)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：我国《刑事诉讼法》第193条规定了量刑程序,使量刑有了基本法律依据,但对于死刑案件,却远远不能满足量刑公平公正需求,引发了诸多弊端,导致法官量刑随意,甚或司法腐败,影响了司法公信力。其成因极为复杂,有理念与需求矛盾,也有制度与执行冲突。死刑案件量刑程序改革势在必行,在考量现实需求和改革难易程度的前提下,应分步实施,走适合我国司法实际的改革之路。Article 193 of the China＇ s Criminal Procedural Law provides for the sentencing procedure, which constitutes the basic law of the sentencing procedure, but for death penalty cases, it cannot meet the demand for a fair and equitable sentencing, causing many problems, leading to arbitrary sentencing judgement and even judicial corruption, affecting the credibility of justice. The causes are complex, there are conflicts between ideas and needs, and there are also conflicts between system and implementation. It is imperative to reform the sentencing procedure in capital cases, under the premise of considering the realistic needs and the degree of difficulty of reform, we can go for China＇ s judicial actual reform, step by step.

关 键 词：量刑程序 弊端 改革 渐进之路 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]