当代中西文论“向外转”的理论异质探析  

An Exploration into the Heterogeneity of the“External Turns” of Critical Theories in China and the West

作　　者：刘锋杰[1] 范永康[2] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学文学院,江苏苏州215123 [2]曲靖师范学院人文学院,云南曲靖655000

出　　处：《学术月刊》2013年第11期118-130,共13页Academic Monthly

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"百年来文学与政治关系论争研究"(07BZW012);国家社科基金重点项目"新时期文艺理论建设与文艺批评研究"(12AZD012)的成果之一

摘　　要：从上世纪90年代开始,当代中国文论受西方文化研究的影响,开始了"向外转",这被视为中西文论"向外转"的"合流"。但深入地看,中西之间仍然存在着理论上的异质性,在依据阶级政治还是依据文化政治、强调审美的形式功能还是强调审美的救赎功能上有所不同。随着西方"后理论"的出现,反思"理论"时代忽略文学性的种种弊端,与中国学者反思文学的再政治化之间具有高度相关性,共同指向对文学审美性的肯定,代表着中西文论"向内转"的悄然到来,应当承认,这才回归了文学研究的学科本位。Since the 1990s, there appeared an ＂external turn＂ in contemporary critical theories in China because of the latter＇s subjection to the influences of cultural studies in the West, hence a ＂joining together＂ of the external turns of critical theories in China and West. A closer examination reveals the theoretical heterogeneity between critical theories in China and those in West in their treatment of class politics and cultural politics, formal function of aesthetics and redemptive function of aesthetics. With the advent of ＂post theory＂ in West, there appears a striking similarity between the Western reflection on the types of deficiency in dealing with literariness in an era of theories and Chinese scholars＇ reflection on the re-politicization of literature, both pointing to the recognition of the aesthetic nature of literature. This heralds the coming of an ＂internal turn＂ in critical theories, which means a return to the disciplinary nature of literary studies.

关 键 词：中西文论 向外转 异质 “后理论” 向内转 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]