汉语双字词语音关联对错误记忆的影响  

The Effect of Chinese Two-Character Words' Phonological Association on False Memory

作　　者：孙文梅[1] 刘海伦[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学教育科学学院,新乡453007

出　　处：《心理科学》2013年第6期1388-1392,共5页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：河南师范大学博士科研启动项目(1031)的资助

摘　　要：研究运用DRM范式,以具有语音关联的汉语双字词为材料,采用2(语音类型)×3(词语类型)被试内实验设计,考察汉语双字词语音关联对错误记忆的影响。结果表明:(1)被试对诱饵词的错误再认率显著高于对填充词的错误再认率,说明汉语双字词语音关联能够诱发错误记忆;(2)双字词表与单字词表的语音关联性错误记忆效应相当,小于语义及字形关联的错误记忆效应;(3)尾音关联词表中词语再认率高于首音关联词表。Using the DRM paradigm, previous studies found semantical false memory. In recent years, experiments with Chinese characters as materials have been conducted to probe the phonological false memories. However, they haven’t arrived at the unified conclusion. So the present study aims to have a further exploration on the effect of false memory induced by Chinese two-character words’ phonological association. The experiment was carried out on computers using the E-prime software and collectively conducted with 48 undergraduate students as the subjects. In the experiment, subjects were presented with 8 lists of Chinese two-character words and the task was to judge whether each testing item was “old” or not. The E-prime software recorded the results of judgment automatically. There were two types of phonological associates. Half of the lists contain words which belong to first-word associates with the first characters having the same syllables and the last characters having the same initials. While the other half contain words which belong to last-word associates with the first characters having the same initials and the last characters having the same syllables. Test materials included three types of words： studied items which were presented at the study phase; un-presented critical lures which were phonologically associated with the studied items and the intruding items which had no relationship with the studied items. A 2（types of phonological associates） ×3（types of test words） within subjects ANOVA reveal significant main effects of both the two independent variables. For the types of phonological associates , F（1,47）=7.784, p〈0.05, and for the types of test words, F（2,94）=474.932, p〈0.05. The false recognition rate of the critical lures is significantly higher than that of the non-studied intruding items, and is close to that of the Chinese single-character words, but is significantly lower than the studied ones’. It shows that： （1） Chinese two-character words’ phonolo

关 键 词：错误记忆 DRM范式 语音关联 汉语双字词 

分 类 号：B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]