《论语·先进》“陈蔡章”考辨  

A Tectual Reaserch on the Section "Chencai" in Chapter Eleven of the Analects of Confucius

作　　者：韩高年[1] 刘洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学文学院,兰州730070

出　　处：《晋阳学刊》2013年第6期34-37,共4页Academic Journal of Jinyang

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"礼乐制度及其变迁与春秋文体源流研究"(项目编号:09BZW020);教育部新世纪优秀人才项目"春秋文学研究"的中期成果

摘　　要：《论语·先进》第二章记述孔子困于陈蔡之事,但此章"德行"以下部分是否应该与之前部分为同一章,至今并无定论。郑玄《论语注》与皇侃《论语义疏》就存有不同观点,后朱熹认为是一章,刘宝楠、程树德、杨伯峻却认为是两章,即从"德行"开始,当另为一章。后一观点虽得到学界广泛认同,但与《论语》成书情况不符。笔者立足于《论语》成书过程,通过考察全书中孔子对弟子的称呼方式,判断章中材料有不同来源,认为《论语》一书虽成于众手,但体例谨严,一章之内主题、时地、人物集中,非随意杂凑。故《陈蔡章》当为一章。The section of ＂Chencai＂, Chapter 11, The Analects of Confucius, describes the Confucius once trapped in Chencai.But whether this chapter ＂Virtue＂ following it should be the same chapter, remains an unsettled issue. Zhenxuan＇s Lun yu zhu （论语注）and Huangkan＇s Lun yu yi shu （论语义疏）had different views on this issue. Later, Zhu Xi thinks these two parts are the same chapter. Liu Baonan, Cheng Shude and Yang Bojun think they are two chapters, from the ＂Virtues＂ Starting another chapter. Latter view was widely recognized by scholars, but it＇s an argument still too inadequate. This paper is based on the Analects of Confucius writing process, through the study of Confucius naming his students form and the Analects of Confucius , discussing this problem again. This paper holds that the author of the A nalects of Confucius is a group. Therefore, the section of ＂Chencai＂ is a chapter.

关 键 词：《论语》 陈蔡章 考辨 

分 类 号：B222.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]