检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈群峰[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第11期64-69,共6页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:无论英美法系国家还是大陆法系国家,派生诉讼都成了中小股东寻求救济的经典途径。我国2005年的《公司法》第152条也确立了股东派生诉讼制度,但建立的只是股东派生诉讼制度的雏形,仍存在许多需要完善的问题。因此通过对股东派生诉讼制度追本溯源,梳理该制度产生和发展的理论依据,探寻我国股东派生诉讼应如何保持激励与制约机制的平衡,以实现维护股东利益衡平和股权平等保护的目标。No matter in Common law countries or in continental law countries, the derivative suit has become a classic way in which the small and medium shareholders to seek relief. China also established in 2005 the shareholder derivative suit system in Article 25 of Company Law. However, there are still many problems needed to be improved for the Company Law of China only established the prototype of the shareholder derivative suit system. So, by the means of tracing the origin of the shareholder derivative suit system, rational analysis of the procedure of shareholder derivative suit and combing the theoretical basis of the emergence and development of the system, balanced Incentive and restraint mechanism of shareholder derivative litigation of our country, in order to realize the balance of the shareholder's interests and equal protection of share.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90