大型底栖动物定量和定性采样方法的对比分析  

Macrobenthos Quantitative and Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Sampling Methods

作　　者：杨柳[1] 汪祖茂[1] 吴忠诚[1] 韩瑜[1] 王立硕 吴秋燕 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院,北京100083

出　　处：《安徽农业科学》2013年第24期10002-10004,10030,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(40901295);北京市财政资金资助项目(PXM2012-178203-000001)

摘　　要：[目的]对比定量和定性采样方法的差异,为进行大型底栖动物的采样提供理论基础。[方法]2011年10月采用定量采样的彼得逊采泥器和定性采样的D型手网对温榆河流域大型底栖动物进行采样,并分析该2种采样方法大型底栖动物各自物种组成、优势种、密度和生物量。[结果]定量和定性采样方法均采集到28种大型底栖动物,有16种相同物种。定性采样中大型底栖动物的密度为7 377ind/m2,大于定量采样中大型底栖动物的密度(6 309 ind/m2)。[结论]在定量采样的同时加入定性的采样方法能够更有效进行大型底栖动物群落的研究和评估。[ Objective] To compare differences of quantitative and qualitative sampling methods and provide theoretical basis lor sampling ot macrobenthos. [Method] In October 2011, the quantitative sampling Peterson grab and qualitative sampling D-frame net were used to collect macrobenthos in Wenyu River, and com.paratlvely analyzed macrobenthos species composition, dominant species, density and biomass. [ Result] Both quantitative and qualitative sampling methods were adopted to collect 28 species of macrobenthos, and 16 kinds of the same species. The qualitative sampling macrobenthos density was 7 377 ind/m2 which was greater than the quantitative sampling macrobenthos density 6 309 ind. m2. [ Conclusion] Combined quantitative and qualitative sampling methods would be more effectively for carrying out macrobenthos community research and evaluation.

关 键 词：温榆河 大型底栖动物 定量 定性 

分 类 号：S271[农业科学—农业水土工程] Q958.8[农业科学—农业工程]