检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张月苗[1] 王婷婷[1] 叶晖[1] 张学智[1] 成虹[1] 李军祥[1] 韩海啸[1] 陈晓伟[1] 杨晋翔[1] 贾云飞[1] 刘永[1] 王慧英[1] 杨蓓[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院中西医结合科,北京100034
出 处:《中国中西医结合消化杂志》2013年第11期587-590,共4页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Digestion
基 金:北京市中医药科技项目(No.KJTS201-5)
摘 要:[目的]观察荆花胃康胶丸联合三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染慢性胃炎的临床疗效及安全性。[方法]采用前瞻性多中心随机对照临床研究,将2012年9月至2013年8月于北京市5个中心医院就诊的150例符合入选标准的患者随机分为荆花胃康组(75例)和含铋四联组(75例)。荆花胃康组予兰索拉唑30mg+阿莫西林1 000mg+克拉霉素500mg+荆花胃康胶丸240mg,2次/d,疗程10d(d1-10),之后予荆花胃康胶丸240mg,2次/d,疗程14d(d11-24)治疗;含铋剂四联组予兰索拉唑30mg+阿莫西林1 000mg+克拉霉素500mg+枸橼酸铋钾220mg,2次/d,疗程10d(d1-10)治疗。记录治疗期间发生的不良反应,疗程结束至少4周后采用13 C-尿素呼气试验判断Hp根除情况。[结果]荆花胃康组、含铋四联组Hp根除率试验方案(PP)和意图治疗(ITT)分别为78.08%(57/73)、76.00%(57/75),83.10%(59/71)、78.67%(59/75),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。荆花胃康组腹胀、嗳气症状改善情况均高于含铋四联组,其中以腹胀改善明显(P<0.05)。荆花胃康组1例患者出现不良反应退出治疗,含铋四联组4例患者出现不良反应,2例退出治疗。[结论]荆花胃康胶丸联合三联疗法治疗Hp感染慢性胃炎疗效与含铋四联疗法相近,但前者改善症状明显、不良反应少。[Objective]To explore the efficacy and safety of Jinghuaweikang Capsules plus triple therapy (LACJ)in treatment of Helicobacter pylori(Hp)associated gastritis.[Methods] A total of 150 patients with Hp infection were recruited from 5 hospitals from September 2012 to August 2013.They were divided randomly into LACJ therapy group and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (LACB) therapy group.Group LACJ received lansoprazole 30 mg+ amoxicillin 1000 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg+ Jinghuaweikang Capsules 240mg,twice a day for 10 days(dl-10),then Jinghuaweikang Capsules 240mg twice a day for 14 days(d11-24).Group LACB received lansoprazole 30 mg+ amoxicillin 1000 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg+ bismuth potassium citrate 220mg,twice a day for 10 days(dl-10).At least 4 weeks after the end of treatment,all patients underwent 13C urea breath test.The side effects were recorded.[Results]The perprotocol(PP)and intention-to-treat(ITT)eradication rates of patients in groups LACJ and LACB were as follows:78.08% (57/73),76.00% (57/75),83.10% (59/71),and 78.67% (59/75).No statistical differences existed between the two groups(all P>0.05).The symptomatic improvements of abdominal distension and belching were higher than those in group LACB.There was statistical difference in the improvement of abdominal distension between the two groups(P<0.05).There was only 1 patient complaining with side effects in group LACJ who quitted the treatment while there were 4 patients in group LACB with 2 of them abandoning the treatment.[Conclusion]The efficacy of LACJ for the treatment of Hp infection patients is similar to LACB,but it improves symptoms better and has relatively fewer side effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249