直丝弓矫正技术两种支抗方法矫治安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突畸形的对比研究  

Comparative Study on Technology of Two Kinds of Anchorage Method in the Treatment of Angle Class Ⅰ Bimaxillary Protrusion Deformity of the Straight Wire

作　　者：王富林[1] 何天亮 畅词 赵静[1] 杜霖[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省绵阳市江油九〇三医院口腔科,绵阳621700

出　　处：《中国医药导刊》2013年第10期1625-1626,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

摘　　要：目的:探讨直丝弓矫正技术两种支抗方法矫治安氏I类双颌前突畸形的效果。方法:选取60例安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突畸形患者,均采用MBT直丝弓技术矫治,其中30例使用J钩支抗,标记为对照组,另外30例使用种植体支抗,标记为治疗组,对比两组矫治前后的X线投影情况和治疗时间。结果:对照组和治疗组的U6C-PP值比较结果具有统计学意义(P<0.01),其他指标均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组平均治疗时间为(26.2±3.6)个月,治疗组的平均治疗时间为(23.4±2.7)个月,对照组长于治疗组,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:种植体支抗操作简单有效,提升了患者的舒适度,在临床上有一定的指导意义。Objective：To investigate the straight wire technique two anchorage method in the treatment of angle classⅠbimaxillary protrusion deformity.Methods：60 patients with angle class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion patients,were treated with MBT straight wire appliance,including 30 cases of the use of J hook anchorage,marked as control group,another 30 cases using implant anchorage,marked as treatment group,the X-ray projection and compared before and after treatment in two groups during treatment between.Results：The treatment group and the control group in the U6C-PP values comparison results with statistical significance （P0.05）.Control group the average treatment time was （26.2±3.6） months,the average treatment time of treatment group was （23.4±2.7） months,the control group in the treatment group,the results were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion：The implant anchorage operation is simple and effective,improve patient comfort,has a certain significance in clinical.

关 键 词：MBT直丝弓技术 J钩 种植体 支抗 

分 类 号：R783.5[医药卫生—口腔医学]