桐城派与汉宋之争  

The Faction of Tongcheng and Han Song Controversy

作　　者：霍省瑞[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川农业大学文法学院,四川雅安625014

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第5期84-89,共6页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(项目批准号:08JJD840200);四川省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目(项目批准号:13SB0201)

摘　　要：汉宋之争,是清代学坛的一椿要案,桐城派与之有着不解之缘。乾隆年间,姚鼐与戴震公开对抗,嘉道年间,方东树与江藩再起波澜,桐城派始终是汉宋之争中宋学派的主要阵营。这既是门户之见使然,更是桐城派尊崇程朱而重治"术"与汉学家尊奉汉学而重治"学"的学术分歧导致的必然结果。嘉道时期的桐城派主张汉宋兼采,表现出开明的学术态度。但是,用汉学之"学"补宋学之"术",汉学为宋学服务,才是他们的最终意图。Han Song Controversy is a famous academic forum in Qing Dynasty, and the faction of Tongcheng has a close contact with it. Yao Nai and Dai Zhen began the controversy, and Fang Dongshu and Jiang Fan made it more fierce. Tongcheng has always been the main camp of the school of Song. This not only is the sectarianism, but also is the inevitable consequence of the academic differences between the factions of Tongcheng and Han. During the Jiaqing and Daoguang era, the faction of Tongcheng advocated adopting both the scholarships of Tongcheng and Han. However, making Han the faction of serviced for the faction of Song is their ultimate intention.

关 键 词：桐城派 汉学 汉宋之争 汉宋兼采 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]