检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西太原钢铁集团公司总医院消化科,山西省太原市030003 [2]上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院消化科,上海市200025
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2000年第12期1336-1338,共3页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
摘 要:目的本文比较氩离子凝固术(APC)和热探头(HP)在治疗消化道息肉中的作用.方法对78例消化道息肉患者分别行 APC 治疗(37例)和HP 治疗(41例).记录两种方法切除消化道息肉的平均时间、症状消失时间、副作用以及治疗创面渗血中的作用.结果与 HP 组相比,APC 组切除息肉的平均时间明显缩短(P=0.0002);且不加用圈套器直接治疗较大息肉时间也明显缩短(P=0.0001);APC 组无明显副作用,而 HP 存在探头粘连等副作用;两组治疗创面渗血作用时间无明显差异.结论 APC 为经内镜非接触性治疗消化道息肉的新方法,此法方便陕捷,疗效较好.AIM To compare the difference between argon plasma coagulator(APC)and heat probe(HP)in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal polyps, METHODS Seventy-eight patients with gastrointestinal polyps were randomly assigned to receive either APC(n =37)or HP(n=41)treatment.We observed the resection time,the duration of the symptoms,the effects of hemostasis and side-effects. RESULTS The pectomic time of APC is shorter than that of HP(P=0.0002),especially in the treatment of large polyps(P=0.0001),without any side-effects.Debris adhered to the probe tip during the treatment by HP. However,the time of coagulation had no difference. CONCLUSION Being effective and lack of severe complication,APC is an alternative therapy in selected patients with gastrointestinal polyps.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.77.120