论侦查人员的讯问行为——以犯罪嫌疑人权利及其保障为视角  

On Investigators＇ Questioning Behavior

作　　者：邓正伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京森林警察学院,南京210023

出　　处：《上海政法学院学报（法治论丛）》2013年第6期106-112,共7页Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law(The Rule of Law Forum)

摘　　要：侦查人员的讯问行为是讯问方法的载体,讯问目标的实现依赖于具体的讯问行为。羁押状态与非羁押状态下的犯罪嫌疑人权利存在差别,可分为完整享有和不完整享有权利。侦查讯问行为直接影响或侵害犯罪嫌疑人的权利。从法律规范层面看,侦查讯问可分为指令性、禁止性和允许性讯问行为。在侦查讯问中,应大力提倡指令性讯问行为,使之得以实现;应从犯罪嫌疑人权利、亲权是否受威胁、侵害界分讯问中的威胁、引诱、欺骗行为是否合法;选择性施行律师在场、检察机关介入讯问、全程录音录像等制度以抑止禁止性讯问行为;从讯问时限、语言和尊重嫌疑人人格等角度规范讯问中的允许性行为。The questioning of investigator is a carrier of methods, and the goal of interrogation depends on the specific questioning. The rights of the criminal suspect in custody or in non-custody are different and can be divided into complete and incomplete ones. The behaviors of investigation and interrogation will directly affect or infringe on the rights of the criminal suspects. From the legal perspective, the interrogations for investigation can be classified into mandatory, prohibitive and permissive. In the investigation and interrogation, we should strongly advocated mandatory, while we need to clarify whether the personal rights and paternity rights of criminal suspects are threatened or infringed, or whether the threat, enticement, deceit behaviors are legal or not. The system must be established to suppress prohibited interrogation as to selectively enforce when lawyer is at present, interrogate involving the procuratorial organs and the entire sound recording or video recording. The permitted interrogation must be regulated in time, language and suspect personality

关 键 词：讯问行为 犯罪嫌疑人 权利保障 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]