单纯泪道探通术与泪道探通联合洛美沙星凝胶治疗婴幼儿泪道阻塞的比较研究  

The comparative study on treatment between simply lacrimal probing and combined with lomefloxacin gel in infants patients with lacrimal duct obstruction

作　　者：鲍云霞[1] 董凯[2] 顾起宏[2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院门诊部,230001 [2]安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院眼科,230001

出　　处：《实用防盲技术》2013年第4期162-163,共2页Journal of Practical Preventing Blind

摘　　要：目的探讨单纯泪道探通术与泪道探通联合洛美沙星凝胶治疗婴幼儿泪道阻塞的不同效果。方法将100例泪道阻塞患儿按来院顺序随机分成A组与B组各50例,A组行泪道探通联合洛美沙星凝胶治疗,B组行单纯泪道探通术。比较2组疗效。结果 2组患儿实施治疗后差异显著(p<0.05),泪道探通联合洛美沙星凝胶治疗优于单纯泪道探通术。结论泪道探通联合洛美沙星凝胶填充治疗婴幼儿泪道阻塞能保持泪道正常生理结构,更好的巩固探通后的效果,防止细菌再生,降低二次阻塞的发生,值得推广。Objetive To study the different between probing of lacrimal passage and probing of lacrimM passage combined with lomefloxacin gel treatment in infants with lacrimal duct obstruction. Methods 100 patients of lacrimal duct obstruction were randomly divided into group A and group B, 50 patients one group .A group： probing of lacrimal passage ; B group： probing of lacrimal passage combined with lomefloxacin gel treatment. Results The two groups after treatment were significant differences. A group was better than B group. Conclusion Probing of lacrimal passage combined with lomefloxacin gel can maintain nm＇mal physiological structure, consolidate probing results, to prevent bacterial regeneration, reduce the incidence of secondary obstruction.

关 键 词：泪道探通 泪道阻塞 洛美沙星凝胶 

分 类 号：R777.2[医药卫生—眼科]