检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄春活[1] 王增全[1] 艾毅龙[1] 韩璐[1] 刘秀梅[1] 余兴华[1]
机构地区:[1]佛山市口腔医院.佛山科学技术学院口腔系,广东佛山528000
出 处:《广东牙病防治》2013年第11期603-605,共3页Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
基 金:佛山市科学技术局医学科研项目(201108044)
摘 要:目的探讨固位纤维在固定正畸治疗后的保持效果。方法正畸治疗后的60例患者随机分为两组,分别采用固位纤维保持器(固位纤维组)和Hawley可摘式保持器(Hawley组)进行保持。两组患者在放置保持器当天(T1)及12个月(T2)制取下颌模型,测量下颌前牙不整齐指数(irregularity index,IRID)。结果固位纤维组在T1、T2时IRID分别为(0.55±0.32)mm、(0.62±0.22)mm,差异无统计学意义(t=0.987,P=0.125);Hawley组在T1、T2时IRID分别为(0.61±0.41)mm、(1.12±0.39)mm,差异有统计学意义(t=4.957,P=0.001)。两组患者在T2时下颌前牙IRID差异有统计学意义(t=6.116,P=0.001),固位纤维组明显低于Hawley组。结论固位纤维维持下颌前牙稳定性效果优于Hawley可摘式保持器。Objective To explore the effectiveness of splinting ribbons as retainer after fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods Sixty patients after orthodontic treatment were randomly divided into two groups: splinting ribbons group used splinting ribbons as retainer, and Hawley group used Hawley removable retaining appliance as retainer. Mandibular models were abtained , and the irregularity index (IRID) of lower anterior teeth alignment was measured on the 1st day ( T1 ) and 12th month (T2) after wearing retainer. Results There was no statistically significance of the difference on the IRID of lower front tooth alignment between T1 and T2 ( P 〉 0.05 ) both in Splinting Ribbons group. IRID of lower front teeth alignment of Splinting Ribbons group were significantly lower than Hawley group at T2 (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The effects of fixed fiber as retainer after orthodontics are significantly better than traditional Hawley retainer, especially in retaining the stability of lower anterior teeth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.35