文化结构分析:论马克思与钱穆文化结构论之异同  

The Analysis of Cultural Structure : The Similarities and Differences Between the Cultural Structures of Marx and Qianmu

作　　者：李承福[1,2] 周德丰[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院 [2]天津外国语大学马克思主义理论翻译与传播研究中心

出　　处：《理论与现代化》2013年第6期45-50,共6页Theory and Modernization

摘　　要：马克思与钱穆都从人的生活来认识文化结构。人的生活不仅包含人与自然、人与人、人与自我的横向结构,人还生活在现实世界与理想世界之中,还有过去、现在与未来一同到场的历史向度,而实践作为人的类本性,整合人的生活的方方面面,使得个体凝聚为民族,文化呈现为民族精神。分析马克思与钱穆文化结构的异同,对于我们深入理解文化与文化结构具有重大理论意义。Marx and Qianmu both agree that the cultural structure have to be based on human＇s way of existence and human＇s life. In human＇s way of existence, its structure not only includes the horizontal structures between man and nature, person to person, and man and self. Human being also lives in the real world and idea[ world, and has the historical dimensions of the past, the present and the future. As the nature of human as species-being, practice integrates human＇s way of existence, and promotes the individuals to condense nations, then makes culture appearing as the national spirit. The analysis of the similarities and differences between Marx＇s and Qianmu＇s theories of cultural structure has important theoretical implications on deepening the understanding of culture and cultural structures.

关 键 词：人的存在 文化 文化结构 实践 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]