The Relative Deprivation Theory and Yemen＇s Uprising  

作　　者：Anahita Motazed Rad Bahman Maleki 

机构地区：[1]Islamic Azad University, lran [2]lndependent Researcher, Iran

出　　处：《Sociology Study》2013年第9期678-683,共6页

摘　　要：The political upheavals in the Arab world during 2011 challenged the political status quo and have irrevocably paved the way toward transformation in the Middle East and North Africa （MENA）, The longstanding structural impediments to equitable growth and social justice afflicting the Arab world came to a head through a combination of persistently poverty, high unemployment, particularly among educated youth, rampant corruption, deficit of democratic governance, and essential freedoms. Yemen is the third country of the Middle Eastern countries which turmoil sparked in. All the uprisings connote of social, political and economic discontent and frustration. The main question and issue of this paper is to answer： What conditions breed change to Yemen？ The paper spotlights ＂relative deprivation＂ of Ted Robert Gurr as the most relevant theory to illustrate roots of the Yemen uprising. Relative deprivation theory holds that instead of an absolute standard deprivation, a gap between expectations and reality leads men to political violence. Therefore, this study is to utilize relative deprivation theory to explain how socio-economic shortages （such as high unemployment and education, along with poverty） and political inefficiencies of the Yemen＇s authoritarian regime led to public and collective discontent and upheaval. The intervened variables such as ＂ethnicity, race, religion, and sexuality＂ and international parameters have not been considered,

关 键 词：Middle East and North Africa （MENA） Yemen＇s upheaval deprivation theory AUTHORITARIANISM socio-economic shortages FRUSTRATION 

分 类 号：F124.7[经济管理—世界经济] X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]