高血压脑出血显微镜下开颅血肿消除术与微创锥颅血肿碎吸引流术治疗效果对比分析  

Microscopically craniotomy hematoma removal surgery and minimally invasive puncture hematoma comparative analysis of operation treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage to attract

作　　者：殷俊[1] 陈磊[1] 朱少峰[1] 蔡小琴[1] 张琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏泰兴市中医院神经外科,江苏泰兴225400

出　　处：《世界最新医学信息文摘》2013年第17期16-17,共2页World Latest Medicine Information Electronic Version

摘　　要：目的：对比显微镜下开颅血肿清除术与微创锥颅血肿碎吸引流术对高血压脑出血病人的治疗效果。方法将40名高血压脑出血病人分为A、B两组，A组行显微镜下开颅血肿清除术，B组行微创锥颅血肿碎吸引流术，对比两组的疗效及预后。结果术后A组平均GCS评分为（10.02±3.67）分高于B组的（12.31±4.92）分（ P0.05）；A组预后明显优于B组（ P〈0.05）。结论相较于微创锥颅血肿碎吸引流术，显微镜下开颅血肿清除术的临床效果与预后都更胜一筹。Objective to contrast microscope for removal of hematoma and minimally invasive craniotomy cone cranial hematoma broken attract lfow effect on the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients. Methods 40 hypertension cerebral hemorrhage patients were divided into A, B two groups, group A line under A microscope for removal of hematoma, craniotomy group B line of minimally invasive cone cranial hematoma broken attract lfow, compared two groups of curative effect and prognosis. Results postoperative group A mean GCS score was （10.02＋3.67） points higher than that of group B （12.31-4.92） （P0.05）;The prognosis of group A was better than group B （P〈0.05）. Conclusion compared with minimally invasive cone cranial hematoma broken attract lfow, under a microscope the clinical effect and prognosis of craniotomy hematoma removal is better.

关 键 词：高血压脑出血 显微镜 微创引流术 

分 类 号：R743[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]