检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]北京市海淀区人民检察院,北京100089
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第12期93-99,共7页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:为完善审查逮捕的诉讼结构,增强审查逮捕环节的诉讼性、公开性和公正性,提高审查逮捕质量,化解社会矛盾,有必要在审查逮捕环节建立听证制度,充分听取侦查机关、犯罪嫌疑人及辩护律师和被害人的意见,以准确作出逮捕与否的决定。我国新修订的《刑事诉讼法》、《律师法》、检察机关提前介入制度和审查逮捕律师介入制度为审查逮捕阶段建立听证制度提供了法律依据和现实可能。审查逮捕听证制度的形式构造主要包括听证的案件范围、听证的程序、听证的内容等。In order to improve the structure of action in reviewing arrest, enhanced the nature of action, openness and fairness, increase the quality of review to arrest and resolve social con- flicts, it is necessary to establish hearing system in reviewing arrest. It is beneficial to listen the views of investigating organs, criminal suspects and defense lawyers and victims fully, and deter- mine whether or not to make the arrest accurately. The newly revised "law of criminal proce- dure", "lawyer law", the system of prior intervention by procuratorial organs and the system of prior intervention by lawyers in reviewing arrest provide a legal basis and realistic possibility to establish this system. The formal construction of this system includes the scope of cases, the hear- ing procedure, the hearing content and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.164.218