非法证据排除规则的虚置化隐忧与优化改革  

The Hidden Worries and Optimization Reform of the Nominal Exclusionary Rule

作　　者：王超[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第12期100-108,共9页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"刑事程序违法的定量分析"(项目编号:12YJA820069)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：尽管我国非法证据排除规则改革取得了突破性进展,但是新的排除规则仍然存在虚置化的隐忧。这不仅在于侦查机关和检察机关因为追诉犯罪的职责而缺乏足够的动力排除对证明犯罪事实起到重要作用的非法证据,而且在于人民法院在适用非法证据排除规则过程中面临诸多困境,如控辩双方的举证能力相差过于悬殊、实行案卷移送主义、滥用自由裁量权等。为了避免现行非法证据排除规则重蹈名存实亡的覆辙,我国亟待继续深化非法证据排除规则改革。Ahhough the reform of the exclusionary rule has made breakthrough progress in China, the new rule still has some hidden worries about its nominal implementation. On the one hand, investigative authorities and People＇s Procuratorates have no enough impulse to exclude the illegally obtained evidence that is important to improve criminal facts because of their obliga- tion of prosecuting crime. On the other hand, People＇ s Courts will be confronted with many di- lemmas when implementing the exclusionary rule, such as the too great difference of the ability to obtain evidence between prosecution and defense, the transferring -files doctrine, and the abuse of a judge＇ s discretionary power. In order tO avoid the new exclusionary rule to fall into the same old trap again, it is urgent for China to continue to deepen the reform of the exclusionary rule.

关 键 词：新《刑事诉讼法》 非法证据排除规则 虚置化隐 忧优化改革 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]