汉语水平考试(HSK)阅读理解测验公平性研究  

DIF Detection and Fairness Study of Reading Comprehension Test on HSK

作　　者：柴省三[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学汉语水平考试中心,北京100083

出　　处：《语言文字应用》2013年第4期107-116,共10页Applied Linguistics

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"中外留学生语言测试体系比较与研究"(13YJA740002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文以中国语言文学专业、经济学专业、生物医学专业和中国历史专业的考生为研究对象,分别使用MH法、STND法和方差分析(ANOVA)技术对HSK(高等)阅读理解测验的公平性问题进行了探讨。研究结果表明:以中国语言文学专业考生为目标组,以经济学专业背景的考生为参照组所进行的DIF检验,未发现系统性项目偏差;四个不同专业背景的考生在六篇阅读材料上的测验分数之间不存在显著性差异,因而测验对四个考生组具有较高的公平性。Test-taker＇ s academic di sources of test bias that needs considering. scipline is one of the most important potential This research addressed itself to the detection of Differential Item Functioning （DIF） and test fairness of the reading comprehension test in HSK. Based on the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure and Standardization methods, this research detected only two items that function differently for the test takers with economics and Chinese majors. Through the Analysis of Variance （ANOVA） , it concluded that there is no significant difference among the six texts from HSK＇ s reading comprehension test for the candidates from Chinese, medicine and biology, economics and Chinese history fields. No evidences indicating biased test are detected.

关 键 词：阅读理解测验 公平性 测验偏差 效度 HSK 语言测试 

分 类 号：H193[语言文字—汉语]