检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市精神卫生中心,200030
出 处:《上海精神医学》2000年第4期211-213,共3页Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
摘 要:目的 比较利培酮和氯氮平治疗住院精神分裂症病人的疗效和费用。方法 利培酮组30例(男性16例,女性14例,平均年龄26.8岁),氯氮平组26例(男性12例,女性14例,平均年龄30.6岁),BPRS评分>30分。比较两组病人住院期间的所有治疗费用及出院时疗效。结果 利培酮组与氯氮平组疗效相当,氯氮平组除住院期间主药费用小于利培酮,其他费用均高于利培酮。结论 利培酮与氯氮平疗效相当,住院总费用小于氯氮平,是一种安全且经济有效的抗精神病药物。Objectives: To compare therapeutic effects and costs between risperidone and clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia during hospitalization. Method: Thirty patients with schizophrenia received risperidone treatment, and twenty-six patients received clozapine treatment. The therapeutic effects and total costs were evaluated and compared. Results: The response rates of this two drugs were similar, the major durg costs in risperidone group were higher than those of clozapine and the total costs in risperidone group were lower than those of clozapine. Conclusion: The results suggests that risperidone is a favorably cost-effective antipsychotic agent.
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229