论武侠小说的文学史模式及其演进  

The Model and Development of the Literary History of the Swordsman Fiction

作　　者：颜水生[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《保定学院学报》2013年第6期12-17,共6页Journal of Baoding University

摘　　要：武侠小说与文学史的结合经历了复杂的过程,历经多种叙述模式的演变,充分反映了文学史学的诸多理论问题。武侠小说的文学史叙述模式大致有"史料考证"、"平民文学"、"旧派小说"、"雅俗互动"等叙述模式,这些叙述模式的历史演变表现了"文学革命"的"态度的非同一性"和"文学史重写"的历史继承性。胡适、鲁迅与周作人的观点的非同一性表现了文学史理论的复杂性与矛盾性,"文学史重写"的不断变迁体现了文学史理论的创新性和突破性,文学史写作实践中存在着"超稳定结构",这种文学史理论与文学史书写实践之间的偏离,形成了文学史学的矛盾规律。The combination of the swordsman fiction with literary history is a very complicated process, for the development of several narrative model, and fully reflect many theoretical problem of the literary .history studies. The narrative model of the swordsman fiction roughly take ＂textual research of historical data＂ ＂popular literature＂, ＂old fictiong＂ and ＂Interaction between Graceful and Popular＂. The development of these narrative model present non identity attitude of the literary revolution, and historical inheritance of ＂rewriting about literary history＂. The non identity point of Hu shi,Lu xun and Zhou zuoren present the complexity and contradiction of the theory of literary history. The development of rewriting about literary history present the innovation and breakthrough of the theory of literary history. The practice of writing literary history exist with hyperstable structure. The deviation between the theory of literary history and the practice of writing literary history form the contradictional law of the literary history studies.

关 键 词：武侠小说 文学史学 叙述模式 历史进化论 二元对立 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]