检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]合肥市口腔医院儿童牙科,安徽合肥231000 [2]安徽医科大学口腔医学院,安徽合肥231000
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2013年第12期795-797,782,共4页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基 金:合肥市科研计划项目(合科201125号77)
摘 要:目的:比较两种不同行为管理方式(1ivemodeling和tell—show—do)在儿童牙科恐惧症患者中的治疗效果。方法:对初次就诊的370名儿童采用儿科恐惧量表(children fear survey schedule—dental subscale,CFSS—DS)评估,对其中154例5~9岁儿童牙科恐惧症患者进行随机分组,A组(/7,=51)livemodeling以母亲为模型,B组(n=51)live modeling以父亲为模型,c组(n=52)采用tell—show—do。在口腔检查和清洁过程中监测每个患儿的心率变化,对结果进行统计学分析。结果:370名儿童牙科畏惧症发生率为41.6%;在口腔检查和清洁过程中,A组患儿心率低于B组(P〈0.05)和C组P〈0.05);B组低于C组(P〈0.05)。结论:live modeling是一种在儿童牙科中应用的有效行为管理技术,模型的选择与儿童年龄有关。AIM: To compare the effects of live modeling and tell-show-do for behavior management of children with dental fear(DF) during dental treatment. METHODS: Children fear survey schedule-dental subscale ( CFSS - DS) assessment was conducted for 370 children aged 5 - 9 years in initial dental treatment. 154 children with DF were randomly divided into 3 groups. The children in Group A ( n = 51 ) were prepared for dental treatment by means of live modeling with the mothers as the models, those in group B (n = 51 ) with the fathers as the models. The children in group C (n = 52) were prepared by a pediatric dentist using the tell- show- do method. Heart rate of the children was monitored during dental treatment. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS : The incidence of DF of the 370 children was 41.6%. During dental treatment the heart rate of the children in group A was lower than that in group B ( P 〈 0.05 ) and in group C ( P 〈 0.05 ), in group B was lower than in group C ( P 〈 0.05 ). CONCLUSION : Live modeling is effective for behavior management of children with DF during dental treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.248.40