流调中心抑郁量表中文简版的编制  

A short Chinese version of center for epidemiologic studies depression scale

作　　者：何津[1,2] 陈祉妍[2] 郭菲[2] 章婕[2] 杨蕴萍[3] 王倩[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学,北京100101 [2]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室 [3]首都医科大学附属安定医院

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2013年第12期1133-1136,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（Y3JJ061004）

摘　　要：目的编制流调中心抑郁量表（Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale，CES—D）中文简版。方法以全国分层随机取样的30801个普通人群样本和415个精神疾患样本为基础，结合独立样本t检验结果与量表信效度指标编制简版，并提出抑郁症状检出的划界分。结果CES—D中文简版共9题，内部一致信度在0．85—0．88，重测信度为0．49（P〈0．001），各条目与总分相关均大于0．5，与原量表相关系数0．94。0．96（P〈0．001）。首诊抑郁患者的量表分高于服药抑郁患者和普通人群。简版量表验证了两维度的因素结构，即积极症状与消极症状。量表以10分和17分为抑郁倾向和抑郁高风险的划界分。结论流调中心抑郁量表9题中文简版的信效度良好，可以在各年龄群体中进行抑郁水平的施测。Objective To develop a short Chinese version of the center for epidemiological studies de- pression scale（CES-D）. Method A stratified random nationwide sample with 30801 normal people and a mental- ly ill sample with 415 patients were tested. Items in the short version were chosen according to both the result of in- dependent t-test in current study and the result of reliance and validity. Cut-off scores were offered to check up de- pressions. Result The internal consistency reliability of the 9-item Chinese version CES-D ranged from 0.85 to 0.88.The test-retest reliability was 0.49（P〈0.001 ）. All item-total correlations were higher than 0.5.The correlation between sumscores of the original scale and sumscores of the Chinese short version ranged from 0.94 to 0.96（P〈 0.001 ） in all the samples.The sum scores of initial diagnosis depression sample were significantly higher than that of treated depression sample and common sample.A two-dimension structure was testified.The cut-off scores of the short version were 10 and 17.Conclusion The 9-item Chinese version of CES-D can be used in various samples with reliable and valid effect.

关 键 词：流调中心抑郁量表 中文简版信度 效度 

分 类 号：R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]