论责任主义在量刑中的贯彻——以数额认识错误型盗窃罪的量刑为例  

Implement of Responsibilism in the Practice of Penalty Measurement

作　　者：刘辰远[1] 童伟华[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南大学法学院,海南海口570228

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第1期106-113,共8页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：没有责任就没有刑罚,只有从责任是非难可能性的角度理解才能积极承认责任减轻引起责任刑减轻。在我国,由于刑法规范中并没有责任主义的规定,量刑中容易致使刑罚溢出。特别是在盗窃罪中,当行为人对盗窃数额认识发生错误时,极易导致结果责任、间接处罚等违背责任主义的结果。因此,应当在盗窃罪的量刑中贯彻责任主义,更好地实现责任与刑罚相适应。＂ Nulla poena sine culpa＂. Only when Responsibilism is understood as culpability, it is positive acknowledged that light punishment fits minor offense. In China, because there is no item of Responsibilism in the criminal law, it brings out heavy punishment in penalty measurement. Especially in Larceny when suspects have cognitional error to amount, it incurs the violation of culpability principle, e.g. ＇consequential responsibility and indirect punishment. In a word, culpability principle should be carried out in Penalty Measurement in order to balance responsibility and punishment.

关 键 词：责任主义 盗窃数额 盗窃罪 量刑 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]