检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡洪[1]
出 处:《中国医学创新》2013年第35期100-102,共3页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探讨老年人消化性溃疡的临床效果,并对其进行相应的研究。方法:选取2011年2月-2013年2月在本院进行治疗的100例老年消化性溃疡患者,随机分为对照组与观察组,每组50例。对照组单用奥美拉唑进行治疗;观察组使用奥美拉唑联合云胃宁治疗,对比两组患者治疗1周后的临床症状缓解情况,及治疗4周后的疗效和不良反应。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为82%,不良反应发生率为12%;对照组治疗总有效率为68%,不良反应发生率为18%,观察组腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暖气等症状的缓解率显著高于对照组。两组治疗总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:老年消化性溃疡患者使用奥美拉唑联合云胃宁治疗,临床效果满意,总有效率优于单用奥美拉唑治疗的患者,可以在临床上广泛推广。Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of elderly peptic ulcer.Method:100 elderly cases of patients with peptic ulcer were selected from February 2011 to February 2013 in our hospital,they were randomly divided into control group and observation group,each group of 50 cases.The control group were treated with omeprazole alone;the observation group were treated with Cloud Weining and omeprazole.The therapeutic effect of the two groups were compared.Result:Total effective rate in observation group was 87.5%,the incidence of adverse reactions was 10.6%.Total effective rate in control group was 72.6%,incidence of adverse reactions was 18.4%.Remission rate of abdominal pain,bloating,acid reflux,heating and other symptoms in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group. Total effective rate in both groups was statistically significant difference (P〈0.05),incidence of adverse reactions was no statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion:Cloud Weining and Omeprazole in treatment of elderly patients with peptic ulcer is more efficient than Omeprazole,it can widely popurarize in clinical practice .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.111.209