超声造影与磁共振成像对义眼座植入后血管化检测的比较  

Comparision of detective effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI on vascularization of hydroxyapatite after intraorbital implantation

作　　者：徐柒华[1] 朱建刚[1] 邹大中[2] 郑永强[3] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省江阴市人民医院眼科,214400 [2]江苏省江阴市人民医院超声科,214400 [3]江苏省江阴市人民医院磁共振室,214400

出　　处：《中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志》2013年第12期894-897,共4页Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease

基　　金：江苏省江阴市科技局项目

摘　　要：目的对超卢造影和磁共振成像评价羟基磷灰仃眶内植入术后帆管化检测进行比较，验证超声造影对义眼座植入术后血管化检测的可行性。方法分别使用超声造影及增强磁共振成像对10例植入羟基磷灰白义眼座术后进行血管化检测，对羟基磷灰石的强化面积及完全血管化时间进行比较。结果两种检查方法都很好地显示了羟基磷灰白义眼座植入术后的血管化过程，每个月两种检查方法显示的强化面积经统计无差别，显示了羟基磷灰石眶内植入术后完全血管化时问是5～6个月。超声造影冠示了更好的动态过程。结论超声造影是一种检查羟基磷灰石义眼座血管化的有效方法，其显示的动态过程优于磁共振成像。Objective To compare the detective effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound （CEUS） and MRI on vascularization of hydroxyapatite after intraorbital implantation and verify the feasibility of CEUS on vascularization detection of hydroxyapatite after intraorbital implantation. Methods CEUS and enhanced MRI were used to detect vascularization of 10 patients with intraorbital implantation of hydroxyapatite, and their hydroxyapatite reinforcement area size and complete vascularization time were compared. Results Both detective methods could show the vascularization process after intraorbital implantation of hydroxyapa- rite. Each month the size of reinforcement areas shown by both methods had no difference and the complete vascularization after intraorbital implantation of hydroxyapatite needed 5 to 6 months. CEUS gave better display of the dynamic process. Conclusion CEUS is an effective method to detect the vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implant, giving a better display of dynamic process than MRI.

关 键 词：超声造影 核磁共振成像 羟基磷灰石 血管化 检测 

分 类 号：R779.64[医药卫生—眼科]