农村生活满意度问卷的修订及信效度检验  

Revision,reliability and validity of the Country Life Satisfaction Questionnaire

作　　者：贾东立[1] 李昌俊[1] 李毅峰[1] 易旭灿[1] 臧亚宾 史康音 

机构地区：[1]河北北方学院法政学院,河北张家口075000

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2013年第12期944-948,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目(HB12JY066)

摘　　要：目的:对农村生活满意度问卷(CLSQ)进行修订与信效度检验。方法:用农村生活满意度问卷对1088名农村被试进行测量,采用简单随机方法抽取一半被试进行探索性因素分析并删除不合适的项目,另一半进行验证性因素分析检验结构效度;用幸福感指数(IWB)进行聚合效度检验;用婚姻调适问卷(MAT)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)和生活事件量表(LES)进行区分效度检验;用留守与非留守妇女群体进行实证效度检验;选取100名被试间隔1个月进行重测。结果:通过探索性因素分析删除了两个题项,发现CLSQ可分为自我认知、基础设施、家庭经济状况、社会环境4个维度;验证性因素分析发现四因素问卷结构较为合理(χ2/df=3.29,CFI=0.90,GFI=0.92,IFI=0.91,RM SEA=0.06)。CLSQ得分与IWB相关最高(r=0.53,P<0.001),其次是MAT、SSRS与LES(r=0.47、0.39、-0.21,均P<0.001)。留守妇女CLSQ总分及各因子分均低于非留守妇女[如,总分(63.5±12.3)vs.(66.0±11.2),P<0.05]。总问卷与各因素的α系数在0.77～0.89之间;重测信度在0.76～0.89之间。结论:修订后的农村生活满意度问卷具有良好的信效度,是测量农村生活状况的有效工具。[Abstract] Objective： To revise and test the reliability and validity of the Country Life Satisfaction Question- naire （CLSQ）. Methods： Totally 1,088 subjects living in the country were assessed with the Country Life Satisfac- tion Questionnaire. They were divided into two groups by simple random sampling method. One group was anaiyzed by exploratory factor analysis to delete the inappropriate items, while the other group was analyzed by confirmative factor analysis to test the construction validity. Convergent validity was tested by Index of Well-Being （IWB）. Di- vergent validity was tested with the Marital Adjustment Test （MAT）, Social Support Rating Scale （SSRS） and Life Event Scale （LES）. Empirical validity was tested with the left-behind and non-left-behind women. One hundred subjects were selected and retested one month later. Results： By means of EFA, 4 factors, namely ＂self-cognition＂, ＂ infrastructure＂,＂ family economic status＂, and ＂social environment＂ were extracted from CLSQ and 2 items were deleted from original questionnaire. The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor model （X2/ dr=3.29, CFI =0. 90, GFI =0. 92, IFI -0. 91, and RMSEA =0. 06）. The CLSQ scores were correlated highest with the IWB scores （r =0. 53, P 〈0. 001）, followed by the scores of MAT, SSRS and LES （r =0. 47, 0. 39, -0. 21, P 〈 0. 001）. Left-behind women scored lower total score and all subscaies than the control group [ e. g., total score （63.5 ±12. 3） vs. （66.0 ±11.2）, P 〈0. 05]. The Cronbach＇s alpha coefficients ranged from 0. 77 to 0. 89 and the test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0. 76 to 0. 89 for the total scale and 4 subscales. Conclusion： It suggests that the modified Version of Country Life Satisfaction Questionnaire is reliable and valid, and could be used as a tool for measuring rural life.

关 键 词：生活满意度 信度 聚合效度 区分效度 实证效度 心理测量学 

分 类 号：B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]