检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李伯琦[1] 孙大磊[1] 刘奕杉[1] 迪丽努尔.阿吉
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院口腔修复科,新疆乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《中国美容医学》2013年第24期2384-2386,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
基 金:新疆医科大学第一附属医院青年基金(项目编号2011QN11);新疆医科大学第一附属医院科研奖励基金(项目编号2012YFY11)
摘 要:目的:评估纯钛铸造支架义齿和钴铬铸造支架义齿临床应用效果。方法:为159例牙列缺损的患者制作110件纯钛支架义齿和123件钴铬合金支架义齿,比较修复后12个月和24个月两组患者的义齿断裂、义齿固位、基牙及义齿功能,评估纯钛铸造支架义齿和钴铬铸造支架义齿的临床修复效果。结果:患者佩戴义齿12个月时,基牙疼痛及咀嚼功能不佳两项,两组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05),其余各项两组间比较均无统计学差异。患者佩戴义齿24个月时,各项两组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:临床观察24个月时,纯钛支架(Ti RPDs)和钴铬支架义齿(Co-Cr RPDs)整体成功率没有显著差异。Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of pure titanium and Co-Cr frame removable denture. Methods 110 pure titanium frame removable dentures and 123 Co-Cr alloy frame removable dentures were made respectively and followed up.try-in,adjustment,denture stomatitis and patients,satisfaction were examined after 12 and 24 months. Results Patients wearing dentures 12 months,denture tooth pain and masticatory dysfunction in two of the abutment teeth,a significant difference (P〈0.05) between the two groups,the remaining were not statistically different between the two groups.Patients wearing dentures 24 months, were not statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion The clinical success rates at 24 months showed no difference between Ti and Co-Cr RPDs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28