检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省湖州市人民检察院,浙江湖州313000
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期109-113,共5页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基 金:浙江省人民检察院2012年度重点课题<检察机关公益诉讼制度研究>(syll2012A10)
摘 要:由检察机关提起民事公益诉讼以维护社会公共利益,是世界各国的通例。我国部分地区的检察机关对此也开展了积极的尝试,取得了良好的法律效果和社会效果,但也遭受了诸如缺乏法律依据,破坏诉讼结构,影响当事人的处分权等质疑。通过分析这些质疑,指出检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的合法性与合理性,并对检察机关提起民事公益诉讼应当遵循的原则,所承担的举证责任和享有的调查权、处分权等问题进行论证,希望能对我国检察机关民事公益诉讼制度的构建有所裨益。Civil public interest litigation filed by prosecutors to protect the public interests is the general practice around the world. Some procuratorate organs in China have made a positive attempt, which obtained grate legal and social effects, while bringing about problems from some aspects, such as lacking legal basis, damaging litigation structure, and affecting the parties' disposition. Through an analysis of the doubts, the authors expound the legitimacy and rationality of the prosecution filed public interest litigation, discuss the principle, the burden of proof, and the rights of investigation and disposition, which is useful to construct public interest litigation filed by prosecutors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222