论芝诺悖论的“语言解答”  

On “Linguistic Solution” to Zeno's Paradoxes

作　　者：宋伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北大学哲学学院,武汉430062

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2013年第12期12-17,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：湖北省教育厅一般项目"穆勒的语言逻辑思想研究"(2012Y006)

摘　　要：20世纪60年代,在西方哲学有关日常语言是否需要改革的争论中,芝诺悖论常常被争论双方用作论证各自观点的一个例证,由此导致了芝诺悖论的"语言解答"和"数学解答"或"科学解答"之间长期的争论。争论的双方互相指责对方没有抓住问题的关键,犯了不相干结论的错误,其中坚持"数学解答"或"科学解答"的一方常常将"语言解答"视为是一种"蒙昧主义"的解答。通过考察这种争论可以看出:给芝诺悖论的"语言解答"简单地贴上一个"蒙昧主义"的标签是不恰当的。In the 1960＇ s, a disputation about that whether or not ordinary language needs to be re- formed happened in western philosophy circle. In the disputation, Zeno＇ s paradoxes were often used as an illustration to support the respective arguments of the disputing two sides, and thus from that a long quarrel between the ＂linguistic solution＂ and the ＂mathematical solution＂ to Zeno＇ s paradoxes was resulted. By examining historically the ＂linguistic solution＂ and its quarrel with the ＂mathemati- cal solution＂, we can find that it is not an appropriate approach to affix simply an ＂obscurantism＂ la- bel to the ＂linguistic solution＂ to Zeno＇ s paradoxes.

关 键 词：芝诺悖论 语言解答 数学解答 

分 类 号：O144.2[理学—数学]