后经典时代的往昔与后传记时代的困惑  

The Past of Post-classics Age and the Doubt of Post- biography Age

作　　者：唐元[1] 

机构地区：[1]防灾科技学院人文社科系,北京101601

出　　处：《天中学刊》2013年第6期89-93,共5页Journal of Tianzhong

摘　　要："性善"与"性恶"、"道问学"与"尊德性"、"今文经学"与"古文经学"、"汉学"与"宋学"等,都曾经作为中国古典经学的基本流派区分而广为人知。从儒家经典的形成时期一直到当下,可以将儒学史分为经典时代、后经典时代、后传记时代。这样的划分可以看出古来儒学发展的一些趋势,并对现今的中国学术提出一些展望。＂Good or evil nature＂, ＂aptitude or attitude＂, ＂new text or ancient text＂ and ＂Han academics or Song academics＂ were once known as basic genre of Chinese classical academics. From the Confucian classics formation period till the present, the history can be divided into classics age, post-classics age and post-biography age. This division can predict the developing trend of the ancient Confucianism and outlook the current Chinese academics.

关 键 词：儒家 经学 传记 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]