摸索证明与民事诉讼证据收集开示的协作  

The Collaboration between Fishing Expedition and Collection and Disclosure of Evidence

作　　者：吴如巧[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2013年第6期47-56,共10页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"协作式民事取证规则制度化研究"(13BFX070);重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费面上资助项目(CQDXWL-2012-191)

摘　　要：我国台湾地区新"民事诉讼法"承认一定范围内的摸索证明为合法,而未采取德国法的摸索证明禁止原则。不负举证责任的当事人基于诚信原则就案件事实的解明负有一定的协作义务,但举证人有违诚信原则的摸索证明仍应予以禁止。法院应通过阐明,协同双方当事人就应证事实及证据方法加以具体特定,在举证人不能特定应证事实及证据方法时,应促使对方进行必要的协作,综合考量双方当事人的实体利益与程序利益,以判断证据声明是否合法。The new Civil Procedure Law of the Taiwan Region recognized the legitimacy of fishing expedition with in a certain range, instead of adopting the principle of prohibiting fishing expedition in Germany law. The party who doesn＇ t have to bear the burden of proof bears some third-party obligations according to the principle of good faith. Fishing expedition against the principle of good faith taken by the party who bears the burden of proof should still be prohibited. The court should assist the parties to specify the facts and evidence of the case by clarification. When the party who bears the burden of proof can not specify the facts and evidence, the court should promote the other party to make the necessary assistance. The court should consider the substantial interests and procedure interests to determine the legitimacy of the evidence statement.

关 键 词：摸索证明 证据收集 开示 协作 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]