新《刑事诉讼法》视野下指定居所监视居住之审视与检察规制  

Examination and Prosecutorial Controls to Assigned Residence and Surveillance of Residence in View of the New Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：孙曙生[1] 沈小平 

机构地区：[1]江苏省行政学院法学部,江苏南京210004 [2]无锡市南长区人民检察院,江苏无锡320203

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2013年第6期121-126,共6页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：新《刑事诉讼法》的立法初衷将监视居住从非羁押性强制措施转变为减少羁押的替代性措施,但具体的条文设计却使监视居住制度产生了内部的分裂:在嫌疑人、被告人自己住所执行的监视居住可以被认为是一种非羁押性的强制措施,但指定居所的监视居住却演变为一种准羁押性的强制措施。我们应立足司法实践,以程序正义与人权保障的价值博弈为切入点,以构建刑事强制措施体系的层次性、完整性为视角,提出通过加强检察机关的监督使该项制度更加完善与更加具有可操作性。The legislative intent of new criminal procedure law is to transform the assigned residence from the non-custody compulsory measure to the substitute measure of reducing custody. But the design of specific provisions causes the internal divisions within the system of surveillance of residence： the designed residence enforced in the home of the suspects and the accused can be considered as a non-custodial compulsory meas ure; yet the surveillance of residence of assigned residence has evolved as a quasi-custody compulsory measure. Based on judicial practice, taking the value game of procedure justice and the guarantee of human rights as a starting point, from the perspective of building a hierarchical and integrated criminal coercive measures system, this article proposes that through strengthening prosecutorial supervision the system can be improved and can be more maneuverable.

关 键 词：监视居住 指定居所 权力制衡 检察监督 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]