检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北金融学院,河北保定071051
出 处:《经济数学》2013年第4期100-105,共6页Journal of Quantitative Economics
基 金:河北省科技厅软科学项目(12457207D)
摘 要:最初的工业区位论过多从静态角度分析基础设施数量对工业区位分布影响,往往忽视基础设施效率的影响.基于此,本文在政府、消费者、企业三方博弈的基础上,探求扩展FC模型下短期及长期均衡条件,进而讨论基础设施数量及效率如何影响区域间产业分布格局.研究发现:基础设施效率影响着劳动力流动,从而影响着其他要素的区域分布.结果表明,不是基础设施数量而是基础设施交易效率影响了工业区位分布.也就是说,基础设施在落后地区的投入并非越多越好,而是效率越高越好.The initial industrial location theory paid too much attentions on the influence of infrastructure number on in dustry distribution, often neglecting the influence of infrastructure efficiency. Based on this, this paper mainly studied how government infrastructure construction affects regional industrial distribution patterns. By the extending FC model, the studies have found it is not the number of infrastructure but infrastructure efficiency that affected the distribution of industrial location. The study found infrastructure efficiency affected the mobility between northern and Southern labor, which influences the re gional distribution of industry. The infrastructure is not the fatal in poor areas, but the efficiency is fatal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.172.251