法律修辞与法律思维  

Legal Rhetoric and Legal Thinking

作　　者：聂长建[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第1期104-108,共5页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目"法律行为理论的法哲学进路"(09XFX001)

摘　　要：法律修辞的主要工作是说服人,而没有正确的法律思维就不能够说服人。法律思维在三个方面推动法律修辞的发展:法律思维中的本质分析法,有助于立法者制定出令人信服的法律和法官做出令人信服的判决;法律思维中的法律方法拓展修辞的功能,在法律存在漏洞的情况下,没有法律说话,却有法律方法说话,法律方法具有雄辩的说服力;法律思维中的类比思维能够揭示出未知事物的真相,推定出一种事实,而事实胜于雄辩,故产生强大的说服力,因而类比思维既是科学的思维,又是辩说的修辞。法律修辞与法律思维休戚相关,提高法律修辞水平首先要提高法律思维能力。The main work of legal rhetoric is to persuade, and without right legal thinking we can not persuade others. Legal thinking pushes forward the development of legal rhetoric in three aspects ： its nature analysis, contributing to the convincing law enacted by legislators and the convincing decision made by judges;its legal methods, which are of eloquent persuasion, expanding rhetoric function：legal methods speak when law says nothing in the case of there being a legal loophole ; its analogical thinking, revealing the truth and inferring a sort of fact, which speaks louder than words, hence with the strong persuasion. Therefore, analogical thinking is both scientific thinking and argumentary rhetoric. Legal thinking and legal rhetoric are of closely related to each other, and to upgrade legal rhetoric one should first upgrade legal thinking ability.

关 键 词：法律修辞 法律思维 类比思维 

分 类 号：D90-055[政治法律—法学理论]