检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津大学管理学院,天津300072 [2]天津港(集团)有限公司,天津300461 [3]天津财经大学数学系,天津300222
出 处:《华东经济管理》2014年第1期138-142,共5页East China Economic Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71302115);教育部人文社科基金项目(13YJC630121);天津市高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(20132141);天津财经大学科研发展基金(Y1109;Y1207)
摘 要:在销售的产品存在价格差异的情形下建立了双渠道营销闭环供应链博弈模型。为了研究政府的干涉措施对双渠道闭环供应链的影响,分别构建了政府干涉前后的分散决策模型,通过求解模型得到了供应链中成员的最优决策及利润,以及制造商利润与政府奖惩力度的临界关系,并以集中决策下的结果作为基准,提出了改进的二部定价契约协调供应链。通过模型之间的比较分析,结合数值算例,得到政府对制造商的干涉措施能够有效提高废旧产品的回收率,而二部定价契约能够有效协调政府干涉下的双渠道闭环供应链。最后,对系统中主要参数进行了灵敏度分析。Based on game theory,closed-loop supply chain models with dual-channel sales were constructed,in which prod ucts were sold at different prices for different channels.To study the effect of government intervention on dual-channel closed-loop supply chain,the decentralized supply chain models were constructed before and after the government interven tion respectively.Each member's decisions and profits were obtained.The critical relationship of the manufacturer's profits and the government's reward and punishment intensity were found.With the equilibrium results under centralized decision-making as a benchmark,a modified two-part pricing contract was designed to coordinate the dual-channel closed-loop supply chain under government intervention.Through the analysis of the models,and combined with numeral example analysis,the conclu sions showed that government intervention on manufacturers could effectively improve the recycling rate,while the two-part pricing method could coordinate closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel sales under government intervention.Finally,the sensitivity analysis of main parameters of the system was conducted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.167.132