颅内动脉瘤辅助栓塞治疗的回顾性研究  

Retrospective study of intracranial aneurysm embolization

作　　者：韦海珠[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南省农垦三亚医院,海南三亚572000

出　　处：《哈尔滨医科大学学报》2013年第3期269-271,共3页Journal of Harbin Medical University

摘　　要：目的探讨颅内动脉瘤的两种辅助栓塞技术与围手术期预后之间的关系。方法回顾2006年5月至2010年12月栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤患者围手术期预后情况,将结果转换为GOS评分,并分组统计;统计学分析两种栓塞技术与围手术期预后之间的相关性。结果共辅助栓塞治疗动脉瘤患者148例,球囊辅助弹簧圈栓塞技术治疗55例,围手术期预后良好率74.5%,重残率20.0%,死亡率5.5%;支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞技术治疗93例,围手术期预后良好率84.9%,重残率9.7%,死亡率5.4%;两组之间存在统计学差异(P<0.001)。结论围手术期预后支架辅助栓塞优于球囊辅助栓塞。Objective To discuss the relationship between the two kinds of intracranial aneurysm embolization techniques and perioperative prognosis.Methods The data of perioperative prognosis for intracranial aneurysms treatment with embolization techniques from May 2006 to December 2010 were reviewed,converted the results into GOS mark and derided into different groups; Statistical analysis of the correlation was made between two embolization techniques and perioperative prognosis.Results A total of 148 patients were received embolism; among them,55 patients were treated with balloon auxiliary embolized technique,and the perioperative prognosis rates of good,morbidity,and mortality were 74.5％,20.0％,and 5.5％,respectively; The stents auxiliary embolized technique for 93 cases,perioperative prognosis rates of good was 84.9％,morbidity rate was 9.7％,and mortality rate was 5.4％.It had statistical differences between two groups （P ＜ 0.001）.Conclusion Perioperative prognosis of patients treated with stents auxiliary embolism superior to balloon auxiliary embolism.

关 键 词：动脉瘤 血管内治疗 支架辅助栓塞 球囊辅助栓塞 

分 类 号：R739.41[医药卫生—肿瘤]