检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学旧桥检测与加固技术交通行业重点实验室,陕西西安710064
出 处:《建筑科学与工程学报》2013年第4期59-64,共6页Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51078038)
摘 要:以1座双索面开口断面大跨径斜拉桥为例,探讨了采用3种主梁简化模型计算开口断面动力特性的差别。结果表明:对于纵飘、侧弯及竖弯各阶固有动力特性,采用单主梁模型、主梁壳单元模型、三主梁模型计算的结果基本一致,将3种模型的动力特性计算用于抗震分析时,结果相差不大;而采用单主梁模型会低估抗扭刚度,对桥梁结构扭转频率产生较大的误差;三主梁模型和主梁壳单元模型结果相近,桥梁抗风分析时不宜采用单主梁模型。Taking a large span cable-stayed bridge with opening section as example, comparing and analyzing three simplified models in computing differences of the dynamic characteristics in opening section, an appropriate computation model for them was recommended. The results show that for each order of the longitudinal drift, lateral bending and vertical bending inherent dynamic characteristics, the results of single-girder model, girder shell element model and triple-girder model are basically consistent. The calculation results of the dynamic characteristics of the three models for seismic analysis are little difference, but single-girder model will underestimate the torsional stiffness and will cause large errors of bridge torsional frequency. The results of triple- girder model and girder shell element model are similar, and single-girder model should not be used when analyzing wind-resistant design of bridges.
关 键 词:桥梁工程 动力特性 三主梁模型 开口断面 主梁 有限元
分 类 号:U448.27[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117