检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:辛敏[1,2] 刘轩[2] 詹欣[1,2] 黄昀[2] 唐劲天[1,2] 盛军[1,3]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学中药学院,北京100102 [2]清华大学工程物理系粒子技术与辐射成像教育部重点实验室,北京100084 [3]云南农业大学普洱茶学教育部重点实验室,昆明650201
出 处:《中国实验方剂学杂志》2014年第3期62-65,共4页Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
基 金:中国博士后基金项目(2013M530603)
摘 要:目的:比较苯酚-硫酸法与硫酸-紫外法在测定千两茶多糖含量上的差异。方法:千两茶粉经水提醇沉,Sevage法除蛋白后,采用苯酚-硫酸法和硫酸.紫外法测定茶多糖含量。结果:苯酚-硫酸法标准曲线方程为Y:4.7550X-0.0295(R2=0.9904),硫酸-紫外法标准曲线方程为Y=4.7700X-0.0651(R2=0.9931),均在0.02~0.1g·L-1有良好的线性关系。所测茶多糖质量分数分别为2.00%,3.21%,其差异有统计学意义。结论:硫酸-紫外法作为一种多糖检测新手段,可简便测定多糖含量。Objective: To compare differences between phenol-sulfuric acid method and sulfuric acid-UV method to determine polysaccharides content in Qianliang tea. Method: The two methods were employed to determine content of polysaccharides in Qianliang tea after water extracting-alcohol precipitating and sevage assays. Result: The total sugar stand curve equation were Y=4. 755 OX - O. 029 5 (R2 = 0. 990 4) (by sulfuric acid-UV method) and Y = 4. 770 0X - 0. 065 1 (R2 = 0. 993 1 ) ( by phenol-sulfuric acid method) , which showed a good linear relationship range from 0.02 to 0. 1 g ·L-1. The determination of phenol-sulfuric acid method and sulfuric acid-UV method were 2.00% and 3.21% , which was statistically significance. Conclusion: As a new method, sulfuric acid-UV method could be a stable and simple method to measure the polysaccharide.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145