检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学食品安全治理协同创新中心
出 处:《科技与法律》2014年第1期26-39,共14页Science Technology and Law
基 金:国家社科基金课题<行政法视野下的自我规制研究>的阶段性成果(11CFX045);中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划资助
摘 要:为了应对食品安全风险,进一步发挥企业主体责任,在企业内部设置食品安全监督员,是一种有效的措施。虽然我国2009年制定的《食品安全法》引入了食品安全员制度,但规定得过于原则。目前,我国《食品安全法》修订在即,最近的《食品安全法(修订草案送审稿)》规定了食品安全员资格,但是,我国在食品安全监督员的任职资格、责任等领域仍然需要进一步规定。日本、韩国的食品安全监督员制度比较成熟,可资借鉴;通过对比分析两种不同的制度背景和运作模式,有助于完善我国《食品安全法》中的食品安全员制度。To cope with food safety risks and further exert the main body responsibility of enterprises, it seems to be an effective measure to establish a system of food safety supervisors within enterprises. Although China has adopted this system in its Food Safety Law enacted in 2009, the provisions are too general to be applied. Currently, the revision of China's Food Safety Law is near at hand and Recent Food Safety Law (revised draft for examination) has prescribed the qualification of food safety supervisors. However, the provision still need to be further detailed in that field as well as the responsibility of food safety supervisors. The systems of food safety supervisors in Japan and in Korean are both relatively mature and therefore worth learning. A comparative analysis of the backgrounds and operational models of these two systems will contribute to the improvement of the system of food safety supervisors in our Food Safety Law.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46