刑事判决说理机制实证研究——基于最高院六个指导案例的视角  

An Empirical Study of Criminal Judgment Reasoning Mechanism——Based on Six Guiding Cases from the Supreme People's Court

作　　者：洪凌啸[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610000

出　　处：《学术探索》2014年第2期47-51,共5页Academic Exploration

摘　　要：刑事判决说理机制是刑事诉讼尤其是刑事审判中的关键一环,它不仅关系到被告人的知情权,更是一国刑事法治运作公开公正的体现。但是,在现有关于刑事判决说理机制的研究中,缺少以实证方法作为指导的研究。有鉴于此,本文选取了最高人民法院公布的六个指导性案例,通过对判决理由部分字数的统计分析,认为判决说理的程度与案件的复杂性以及控辩双方对抗程度有关,而与犯罪的严重程度、审级的高低无涉。Criminal judgment reasoning mechanism is a key step in the criminal trial, as it not only concerns the defendant＇s right to know, but also is an embodiment of the open and fair operation of criminal law in a country. However, in the existing re- search about criminal judgment reasoning mechanism, there are few empirical studies. In view of this situation, the paper selects six published guiding cases of the Supreme People＇s Court and makes a statistical analysis of the reasoning words in their decision making part. It is found that the degree of judgment reasoning is related to the complexity of the cases and the degree of the con- frontation, but not the degree of severity of the crime and the level of the trial.

关 键 词：判决说理 实证研究 指导案例 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]