国内高校学术道德规范文本比较分析——基于对国内9所“985工程”大学的调查  

Comparative Analysis on the Academic Ethics Text in Chinese Universities—Based on the survey of nine “985 project” universities in China

作　　者：司林波[1] 

机构地区：[1]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第6期42-48,共7页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2010年度教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(10YJC880105)

摘　　要：通过对国内9所"985工程"著名高校学术道德规范文本的比较分析,发现各高校在文本的主要内容、适用对象、机构设置、处理程序和力度等方面既有共性,也有差异,特别是这些高校的学术道德规范文本在适用对象、问责程序、可操作性、透明度、参与度以及救济机制等方面的规定还存在问题。为了完善学术道德规范文本并加强学风建设,各高校应该加强学术道德规范制定的沟通交流,从学理上理清学术不端的形式和范畴,建立科学具体的学术不端行为评鉴标准,加强学术道德规范和学术诚信教育,制定严密规范的问责程序,鼓励学术活动中广泛参与和监督,积极推行第三方调查问责制度,建立公开透明的问责机制,健全问责救济机制等。Based on the comparative analysis of the academic ethics text of the ＂985 project＂ famous universities in China, it can be found that each university has common characteristics on the main content of the text, applicable objects, institutions, punishment procedure and strength, and also has some differences. Especially, there are some problems in the academic ethic texts of these universities in some aspects such as in the applicable objects, the accountability procedure, operability, transparency, participation, the construction of the relief mechanism and so on. To improve the academic ethics text and strengthen the construction of style of study, these universities should strengthen the communication in the process of the establishment of academic ethics, sort out the form and category of academic misconduct from the theory, establish specific and scientific judgment standard of academic misconduct, strengthen the education on the academic ethics and integrity, formulate strict and normative accountability procedure, encourage the broad participation and super- vision in the academic activities, promote third-party investigation and accountability actively, establish a transparent ac- countability mechanism, and improve accountability relief mechanism, etc.

关 键 词：学术道德 学术规范 学术不端 学术问责 

分 类 号：G463[文化科学—教育学]