城市居民环境行为的结构制约  

Urban Residents' Environmental Behavior and Its Structural Constraints

作　　者：彭远春[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学

出　　处：《社会学评论》2013年第4期29-41,共13页Sociological Review of China

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目“我国公众环境行为及其影响因素研究”(12CSH033);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“公众环境行为的影响因素研究”(2012QNZT196)

摘　　要：基于社会行动论等理论与相关研究经验,构筑出环境行为的结构制约模型,以探究阶层地位、地区差异与环境信息获取对环境行为的制约作用。研究发现,环境行为的结构制约模型大体得以验证,碎片化的阶层状况、环境保护欠缺阶层基础以及趋中化的阶层认同等使得阶层地位假设只得到部分验证;城市差异假设得以验证而区域差异假设未获支持则反映出污染驱动论解释的局限性;环境信息获取直接影响环境行为的同时,亦起着较为重要的中介作用;制约私域环境行为与公域环境行为的具体因素有所不同,且结构性因素更能解释私域环境行为。进而提出采用多元方式收集分析纵贯资料、比较城乡居民环境行为以及将心理性因素与更广结构性因素结合起来探讨不同类别的环境行为以推进既有研究。Based on social action theory and relevant researches, we build a structural constraint model to explore the relationships between class status, regional differences and environmental information acquisition and urban residents＇ environmental behavior. The results suggest that the model is largely valid. Unfortunely, the class status assumption is only partially verified, and the possible reasons are： 1）the fragmentation of class status, 2）lack of environmental protection class basis and, 3） central tendency of class identification. City difference hypothesis is accepted, while egional differences hypothesis is not supported, which reflects the limitation of pollution drive theory. Environmental information acquisition directly affects the environmen- tal behavior, which also plays an important intermediary role. Factors affecting private-sphere environmental behavior and public-sphere environmental behavior are different, and the former can be better explained by structural foetors. In order to promote future research, we propose to adopt various research methods to collect longitudinal data, comparative analysis of the environmental behavior between urban and rural residents, and combine the psychological foetors with structural factors to explore different types of environmental behavior.

关 键 词：环境行为 阶层地位 地区差异 环境信息获取 

分 类 号：X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]