检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周运会[1]
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学外国语学院,福建福州350007
出 处:《外国语言文学》2013年第4期258-264,286,共7页Foreign Language and Literature Studies
摘 要:隐喻作为一种语言形式和认知方式,都存在着模糊性。以往的研究从不同的角度论及隐喻的模糊性,但对这一问题缺乏充分而全面的论述。有鉴于此,本文尝试从三个层次对隐喻的模糊性进行全面的探讨:①隐喻作为一个范畴,其成员的地位不平等,边缘具有模糊性。②隐喻所表达的语义具有模糊性。③隐喻是一种模糊的认知方式。本文通过分析不同层次的隐喻模糊性,力图清晰地呈现隐喻模糊性的立体形象,以期有助于隐喻和模糊语言的研究。Vagueness is pervasive in both linguistic and cognitive metaphors. Although many researches have been conducted to address this problem from different perspectives,none of them is thorough enough to offer a comprehensive understanding of the issue. This paper subjects metaphorical vagueness to a detailed analysis and comes to three conclusions: 1) metaphor is a fuzzy category with members of unequal status; 2) metaphorical meaning is always vague; 3) metaphor functions as a fuzzy mode of cognition. In drawing these conclusions,the paper calls attention to the multi- dimensional character of metaphor's vagueness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222