检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡云飞[1] 黄韵红[1] 倪刚[1] 龙金华[1] 陈梦翔 杨芳[1]
机构地区:[1]贵阳医学院附属肿瘤医院贵州省肿瘤医院淋巴瘤科,550004
出 处:《白血病.淋巴瘤》2013年第12期729-731,735,共4页Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
摘 要:目的 比较骨髓涂片、骨髓活组织检查和流式细胞术三种方法对淋巴瘤患者骨髓受累的检测情况,为临床检测骨髓受累提供选择.方法 收集68例恶性淋巴瘤初治患者,观察骨髓涂片、骨髓活组织检查和流式细胞术三种方法检测淋巴瘤患者骨髓受累的阳性率.结果 68例恶性淋巴瘤患者检测骨髓受累时,骨髓涂片、骨髓活组织检查和流式细胞术的阳性率分别为16.2%(11/68)、33.8%(23/68)和10.3 %(7/68),骨髓活组织检查阳性率高于涂片和流式细胞术检查,三种方法阳性率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).对三种检测方法进行相关性分析,骨髓涂片与骨髓活组织检查存在相关性(P=0.002),与流式细胞术没有相关性(P=0.270).结论 骨髓涂片细胞形态学检查是检测淋巴瘤患者是否有骨髓受累的基础方法,骨髓活组织检查阳性率较高,有明显的优势,但需与骨髓涂片互为补充.Objective To compare the effectiveness,correlativity,and acceptability of the three methods:bone marrow smear,biopsy and flow cytometry in diagnosis of lymphoma patients with bone marrow involvement.Methods 68 cases of early stage lymphoma were studied by observing and comparing positive rates of the three methods:bone marrow smear,biopsy and flow cytometry.Results After confirming the bone marrow involvement,the positive rates for the 68 cases using bone marrow smear,biopsy and flow cytometry were 16.2 % (11/68),33.8 % (23/68) and 10.3 % (7/68) respectively.Bone marrow biopsy had the highest positive rate compared to the other methods.It was statistically significant when comparing the differences of the 3 methods (P < 0.05).According to the correlativity analysis of the 3 methods,bone marrow smear and biopsy correlated with each other (P =0.002),while flow cytometery did not (P =0.270).Conclusions Morphological examination of the bone marrow smear is a fundamental method to test bone marrow involvement in lymphoma.Bone marrow biopsy creates the highest positive rate and has clear advantage compared to the other methods,however,bone marrow smear must be used at the same time as a complement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49