检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长春大学公共外语教研部,吉林长春130000
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第1期102-105,共4页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:吉林省教育厅人文社会科学研究"十一五"规划课题(吉教科文验字[2011]第198号);吉林省社会科学基金项目(2012B210)
摘 要:古代西方文学语言研究的发展相对迟缓,载体论是其代表性的理论观点,与此同时中国的文学语言研究涉及内容广泛,思想内涵丰富,但理论脉络较为模糊;近现代西方的文学语言研究呈现出百家争鸣的局面,同时折射出泛化的学术倾向。此一时期中国的文学语言研究深受西学东渐的影响,有忽略自身传统的学术盲动的趋向。无论是中西方,新时期的文学语言研究都有必要进行综合性的学科建设和整合,使其步入健康的发展轨道。In ancient time,the theoretical development of Western literary language study is comparatively slow and the carrier theory is the most representative theory among some others. During this time, Chinese literary language study covers a wide range of contents and with deep philosophical thinking, but is not as logically clear as Western theories. Entering the modern time, Chinese literary language study is greatly influenced by Western literary trends and turn to neglect its own academic tradition while Western literary language study tends to flourish. By the contrastive study, we draw the conclusion that in the new era, both Western and Chinese literary language study should undertake the process of comprehensive study and subject integration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42