检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]聊城市人民检察院,山东聊城252000 [2]临沂市罗庄区人民检察院,山东临沂276017
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2014年第1期96-101,共6页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:检察人员办理刑事上诉案件存在信息来源渠道不畅、开庭审理范围模糊、径行发回重审监督不到位、全面审查原则虚置、发表出庭意见不规范、处境尴尬等问题,产生上述问题的根源在于对上诉审的功能、检察人员出席上诉法庭的职能认识模糊以及检察一体原则与检察官客观义务的内在冲突。The procurators handling criminal cases on appeal are faced with many problems: the sources of in- formation channel are not smooth, the trial scope is fuzzy, proceed to the retrial supervision does not reach the des- ignated position, the principle of comprehensive review does not work, court opinion is not standard and the posi- tion is awkward. The root causes of the above - mentioned problems lie in the fuzzy understanding of the function of trial appeal and the function of procuratorial personnel to attend the court of appeal, the internal conflict between the principle of procuratorial integration and the objective obligation of prosecutors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31